Can you spot what's wrong?
First problem discovered on Champagne No.21!
The rudder cassette wobbles before the rudder even starts to move
Not ideal when you're trying to steer one of the fastest boats on the Thames.
The restoration begins...
Can you spot what's wrong?
First problem discovered on Champagne No.21!
The rudder cassette wobbles before the rudder even starts to move
Not ideal when you're trying to steer one of the fastest boats on the Thames.
The restoration begins...
Most photographs now live very short lives.
They are taken, glanced at, perhaps cropped slightly, posted online, liked by three people, ignored by several hundred algorithms, and then quietly buried under the next batch of pictures.
But some photographs deserve better than that.
Some images need to come off the screen and become something physical. Something you can stand back from. Something you can put on a wall. Something that makes you stop for a moment when you walk past it.
That is the idea behind creating an A1 print of Champagne, our Thames A-Rater.
She has already appeared in photographs, videos, social media posts and restoration notes. She has sat in the boat park, been inspected, discussed, photographed, worried over and admired. But printing one of those images at A1 size changes the whole relationship with the picture.
It stops being “a photo of the boat”.
It becomes a statement.
It says: this project matters.
There is something wonderfully bold about an A1 print.
It is not a small framed snapshot tucked away on a shelf. It is large enough to dominate a wall, large enough for details to matter, and large enough to make visitors ask, “What boat is that?”
That, of course, is the dangerous question.
Because anyone who asks may then receive a full lecture on Thames A-Raters, the Upper Thames Sailing Club, restoration work, the River Thames, racing history, old sails, new sails, varnish, covers, rigging, and why I now appear to own a very elegant floating financial responsibility.
A1 printing also links several parts of Philip M Russell Ltd together: photography, large-format printing, video promotion, sailing media, design, colour correction and storytelling. It is not just decoration. It is part of the wider Champagne story.
A good print can be used in the house, in the studio, at events, in video backgrounds, on social media and perhaps even as part of promotional material for the boat’s restoration journey.
The first challenge is choosing the photograph.
That sounds simple until you open the folder and discover that you have taken far too many pictures from slightly different angles, all of which seem important at the time.
The right image for a large print is not always the same as the right image for social media. A phone screen rewards bold, simple pictures with obvious subjects. A large print allows more subtlety. It can include background, texture, reflections, ropes, shadows, boatyard clutter and details that reward closer inspection.
For Champagne, I would be looking for one of several possible approaches.
This is the classic image: the boat looking elegant, purposeful and slightly dramatic. Ideally, the hull is clearly visible, the name is readable, and the photograph says, “This boat has history.”
A low angle can help here. Boats often look more impressive when photographed from slightly below deck level rather than from standing height. It gives the hull more presence and makes the mast, rigging and lines feel more important.
This is not necessarily the prettiest picture, but it may be the most honest one.
A boat in the boat park, under a temporary cover, with marks, scratches, old fittings and work still to do can tell a better story than a polished glamour shot. It says: this is where the journey begins.
For a restoration project, that can be powerful. The print becomes a “before” image. Later, when Champagne is polished, varnished, re-covered, re-rigged and hopefully racing properly, we can compare the two stages.
The dream image, of course, is Champagne on the water.
A Thames A-Rater belongs on the river. The long hull, tall rig and classic proportions make most sense when she is sailing. The water gives reflection, movement and atmosphere. Trees, club pontoons and Thames light all help to place the boat in her proper world.
The difficulty is that sailing images are harder. The boat is moving, the light changes, the safety boat moves, the photographer moves, and everyone is busy trying not to hit anything.
Which is inconsiderate of them when one is attempting fine art.
Once the image is chosen, cropping becomes the next major decision.
Cropping is not just cutting off the untidy bits. It is deciding what the photograph is really about.
For an A1 poster, the crop needs to work from a distance and up close. The main shape should be clear across the room, but the details should still reward someone standing nearby.
A wide landscape crop might suit a boat on the water, especially if the mast, river and reflections are all important. A portrait crop could work if the mast and rigging create strong vertical lines. A square crop might give a more modern gallery feel, although it can waste some of the drama of a long racing boat.
With Champagne, the long, elegant hull is one of the defining features. I would be reluctant to crop too tightly unless the image was focusing on a specific detail: the name, the bow, the rigging, a varnished section, or the texture of the deck.
The key question is simple:
What do I want people to notice first?
If the answer is “the whole boat”, the crop should give her space.
If the answer is “the name Champagne”, the crop can be tighter and more graphic.
If the answer is “the restoration story”, then a little boat park context may be worth keeping.
This is where the cheerful artistic process meets the cold judgement of pixels.
An A1 print is large: 594 mm by 841 mm. That means a photograph which looks sharp on a phone can suddenly look disappointingly soft when printed big.
The good news is that modern cameras have made large printing much more achievable. A high-resolution image from a proper camera should usually produce an excellent A1 print, especially if the viewing distance is reasonable.
But there are still things to check:
Is the subject genuinely sharp?
Was the shutter speed fast enough?
Is there motion blur?
Was the focus on the boat or on a highly artistic piece of background shrubbery?
Has the image been cropped so heavily that too few pixels remain?
Is the file a full-resolution original, not a compressed social media version?
This is one reason I try to keep original image files carefully. The version uploaded to social media is rarely the version you want to print. Social platforms compress images, resize them and generally treat them with the care of a hurried person folding a sail in a gale.
For printing, always start with the best original file.
Screens glow. Paper does not.
That single fact explains many printing disappointments.
An image that looks bright and punchy on a monitor may print darker, flatter or slightly different in colour. Blues can shift. Shadows can block up. Whites can lose detail. A lovely golden varnish tone can become orange if handled badly.
For Champagne, colour matters. The boat’s character is tied to her materials, her finish, the river environment and the feeling of classic sailing. The print needs to look natural, not over-processed.
Colour correction for a large print might include:
Slightly lifting shadows so hull details remain visible
Protecting highlights in the sky, sails or reflections
Correcting colour cast from shade, cloud or artificial light
Enhancing contrast without making the image harsh
Keeping wood tones warm but believable
Making sure whites are not too blue or too yellow
This is also where a calibrated monitor helps. But even without perfect equipment, test prints can be valuable. A small proof print may reveal that an image is too dark long before you commit to a full A1 sheet.
Sharpening is one of those editing tools that begins as a useful adjustment and can quickly turn into a crime scene.
A little sharpening helps bring out detail in ropes, fittings, planking, texture and lettering. Too much sharpening creates halos, crunchy edges and a rather artificial look.
For a boat poster, the danger is over-sharpening the rigging and high-contrast edges. Masts, stays, ropes and hull lines can start to look harsh if pushed too far.
The best approach is usually subtle output sharpening designed for print. The image should look crisp, but not brittle.
A classic boat should not look as though it has been processed through a video game engine.
Paper choice changes the mood of the final print.
Gloss paper gives strong contrast, rich colours and deep blacks. It can make a photograph look dramatic and polished. For a striking image of Champagne on the water, gloss could work beautifully, especially if there are reflections and strong light.
The downside is glare. A glossy A1 print behind glass can become a mirror if placed opposite a window or light source. You may end up admiring your own reflection rather than the boat, which is not the point unless one has become dangerously vain.
Matte paper gives a softer, more refined look. It reduces reflections and often feels more artistic or gallery-like. It can suit restoration images, black-and-white versions, softer river light and more subtle colour palettes.
For a classic Thames A-Rater, matte paper has real appeal. It can make the image feel less like a commercial poster and more like a piece of wall art.
A middle option may be best: satin or lustre paper. It gives good colour and contrast without the full glare of gloss.
For Champagne, I would probably start with a satin finish. It gives the image presence, but still feels tasteful enough for the house.
At least, that is the theory. The danger with printing is that one test leads to another test, and before long the house begins to resemble a small maritime gallery.
A1 prints need careful handling.
They are large enough to bend, crease and attract fingerprints from people who say, “I’m being careful,” while doing the exact opposite.
Framing gives the print protection and importance. A simple black, white, oak or dark wood frame could all work, depending on the image and where it will hang.
A mount can make the print feel more finished, although with A1 size the overall framed piece becomes quite large. Without a mount, the photograph feels more like a bold poster. With a mount, it feels more like a gallery print.
For Champagne, I would be tempted by a clean, simple frame that does not compete with the boat. The frame should support the image, not announce itself.
This is not the time for a wildly ornate gold frame unless we are deliberately going for “Victorian yacht club meets eccentric professor”, which, now I think about it, may not be entirely off-brand.
The location matters.
A print changes depending on where it is seen. A hallway image is passed quickly. A sitting room image is lived with. A studio image becomes part of a working background. A teaching room image starts conversations. A workshop image becomes inspiration and possibly a reminder of all the jobs still waiting.
Possible homes for the Champagne print include:
This makes the print personal. It becomes part of family life and the story of the boat. It says that Champagne is not just a project but something we care about.
This could work well as a video background. A large framed image of Champagne would immediately link the sailing videos, restoration updates and media work together.
This is more practical and perhaps more dangerous. A beautiful print in the workshop may inspire restoration work, but it may also collect dust, varnish fumes and the occasional airborne object.
This could act as a conversation starter. It shows students and parents that Philip M Russell Ltd is not just about lessons and exam papers, but also about practical projects, photography, engineering, media and problem solving.
Printing a photograph is slightly unforgiving.
On a screen, you can swipe past weaknesses. On a wall, they stare back at you.
A printed image makes you notice composition, focus, colour, detail and mood in a new way. You see things you missed. Sometimes you notice mistakes. Sometimes you notice qualities you had not appreciated.
A photograph that seemed ordinary on screen can become powerful when printed large. Equally, a photograph that looked impressive on a phone can fall apart when enlarged.
That is useful.
Printing teaches you to become a better photographer. It forces you to slow down and ask better questions.
Did I stand in the right place?
Did I wait for the right light?
Did I leave enough space around the subject?
Did I capture the feeling of the moment?
Did I take a photograph, or merely collect evidence that something existed?
For Champagne, this matters because the project is not only about repairing and sailing a boat. It is also about telling her story well.
The first photographs of Champagne are partly documentary. They record what she looked like when she arrived, what needed attention, what condition the cover was in, how the hull looked, where the fittings were, and what work might be required.
But some of those documentary photographs may also become art.
That is one of the joys of practical projects. The dividing line between record keeping and storytelling is very thin. A picture taken to show a repair may later become the image that defines a whole chapter of the restoration.
A boat in a boat park is not just a boat in a boat park.
It is anticipation.
It is work waiting to happen.
It is a slightly terrifying purchase decision made visible.
It is the beginning of a story.
An A1 Champagne print could also be more than decoration.
It could become part of the wider media project:
A background for YouTube videos
A display piece for sailing events
A prop in restoration updates
A photograph for social media posts
A visual anchor for the Champagne brand
A possible basis for smaller prints, cards or merchandise
A reminder of how far the project has come
Large prints have presence. They help turn an idea into something tangible.
In a digital world, physical objects still matter.
There is a particular satisfaction in seeing your own photograph printed properly.
It is no longer just data. It has weight, surface, size and permanence. You can hold it. You can frame it. You can hang it. You can stand back and judge it.
That changes the way you value the image.
For me, printing Champagne at A1 would not just be about making a nice picture for the wall. It would be about marking the beginning of a new project: the restoration, sailing, filming and storytelling of a Thames A-Rater with history, elegance and a to-do list.
Quite a long to-do list.
Possibly several lists.
Some of them involving varnish.
Some photographs deserve more than a quick scroll on a phone.
They deserve paper, ink, space and attention.
Creating an A1 print of Champagne is not just a photographic exercise. It brings together sailing, restoration, design, large-format printing, storytelling and a little bit of domestic negotiation about wall space.
Choosing the right image, cropping it carefully, correcting the colour, sharpening it properly, selecting the paper and framing it well all help turn a photograph into something more permanent.
And perhaps that is the point.
Champagne is not just a boat we bought.
She is becoming a story we are telling.
An A1 print on the wall is one way of saying: this story has properly begun.
There are moments in boat ownership when enthusiasm needs to be firmly grabbed by the collar and told to sit down quietly.
Champagne, our Thames A-Rater, is back on the river, looking elegant, dramatic and faintly capable of emptying a bank account if left unsupervised. She has already been water-tested and even had a brief return to racing, which is rather exciting. But before we get too carried away with sails, varnish, filming, racing and pretending we know exactly what we are doing, there is a small but important job that cannot be ignored.
Champagne has a couple of small gouges in her hull.
They are not enormous. They are not the sort of damage that makes everyone in the boat park gather round with concerned faces and mugs of tea. But they are there, and on a GRP hull, small damage is still damage.
Before we do too much sailing, they need to be repaired properly.
It is tempting to look at a small gouge and think, “That will be fine for now.”
This is one of those dangerous phrases, rather like:
“That screw is probably tight enough.”
“The weather should hold.”
“I’ll just do a quick coat of varnish.”
With GRP — Glass Reinforced Plastic — the outer surface protects the structure underneath. If the gelcoat is damaged and the laminate underneath is exposed, water can begin to get where it should not. On an older racing boat, especially one we want to restore properly, that is not something to ignore.
A Thames A-Rater may look delicate and glamorous, but underneath the long lines, tall rig and elegant history, she is still a working racing boat. She has to cope with launching, recovery, moorings, river banks, trailers, crew movement, water pressure, knocks, bumps and the occasional moment when the helm and physics disagree.
So the plan is simple: repair the gouges before they become bigger problems.
The first temptation with a hull gouge is to think of appearance. Of course, I want Champagne to look good. She deserves to look good. A boat called Champagne should not look as if she has been dragged through a hedge backwards, even if restoration sometimes feels rather like that.
But the real reason for repairing these gouges is protection.
A proper repair should:
That last point is important. A quick smear of filler may look acceptable for about ten minutes. Then vibration, flexing, water and use can expose the fact that the repair was more cosmetic than structural.
The aim is not just to hide the gouge. The aim is to repair it.
The first job is cleaning.
This sounds dull, which is why it is important. Many workshop disasters begin because someone wanted to get to the exciting bit too quickly.
The damaged area needs to be washed thoroughly with soap and water to remove dirt, river grime and anything else that has collected on the hull. After that, it should be wiped with a suitable wax-and-grease remover or marine solvent.
This matters because epoxy and gelcoat do not bond well to dirt, polish, wax, grease or old contaminants. If the surface is not clean, the repair may only be attached in a theoretical sense, which is rarely enough when boats and water are involved.
This is the restoration equivalent of exam technique: the boring preparation often decides whether the final answer works.
The next step is to prepare the shape of the damage.
A gouge with sharp vertical edges is not ideal for repair. The filler needs a good surface to grip, so the edges should be bevelled out using something like 80-grit abrasive paper or a small rotary tool.
The idea is to create a shallow, sloped edge rather than a hard-sided hole. A commonly suggested approach is a generous taper, sometimes described as around a 12:1 bevel for structural repairs. For a small surface gouge, the exact geometry may be less dramatic, but the principle is the same: do not just fill a narrow crack and hope.
A bevel gives the repair more bonding area.
It also helps avoid the classic problem where the filler feathers out too thinly at the edge and then cracks, chips or lifts later.
This is the point where patience starts to matter. It is very easy to think, “Surely that is enough sanding.” Usually, it is not.
For the actual filling, the plan is to use a marine-grade epoxy system thickened with a suitable filler.
A resin on its own is too runny for this job. It needs to be thickened so that it can be pressed into the gouge and stay there without sagging. High-density filler or colloidal silica can be used depending on the exact repair and product system.
The texture often described is “peanut butter” or “mayonnaise”.
This is wonderfully unscientific language for something that is actually quite important. Too runny, and it slumps, drains or leaves gaps. Too thick, and it becomes difficult to press fully into the damage.
The mixture needs to be thick enough to hold its shape, but workable enough to spread and compact into the gouge.
As someone who spends a lot of time teaching science, I rather like this stage. It is chemistry, materials science and practical judgement all in one small pot. The ratios matter. The mixing matters. The working time matters. The temperature matters. And, as always, the instruction sheet is not just decorative paper.
Once mixed, the thickened epoxy can be applied with a plastic spreader or putty knife.
The key is to press the mixture firmly into the damaged area. The aim is not to gently decorate the top of the gouge, but to fill it properly.
The repair should be left slightly proud — raised a little above the surrounding hull surface. This allows for sanding back later. If the filler is applied exactly level, any shrinkage, settling, sanding or small error may leave a shallow dip.
And a shallow dip will catch the light beautifully every time you look at it, just to remind you that you rushed.
A proud repair gives room for adjustment.
This is the most difficult part of many repairs.
Leave it alone.
Epoxy needs time to cure properly according to the manufacturer’s instructions. That may be around 24 hours, depending on the system, temperature and conditions. Cold, damp weather can slow curing. Warm conditions can shorten working time.
This is where boat restoration and British weather form a partnership designed to test character.
The repair may look ready before it is ready. It may feel tempting to sand too soon. But if the material has not cured properly, sanding can tear, clog, smear or weaken the finish.
So the glamorous restoration activity for this stage is waiting.
Possibly with tea.
Once cured, the repair can be sanded down.
This is where the sanding block earns its keep. Sanding by hand without a block can create uneven surfaces, finger marks and soft hollows. A block helps level the repair to the surrounding hull rather than simply smoothing the bump.
The first stage can be done with something like 80-grit paper to bring the raised repair down carefully. Then finer grades, such as 150 to 220 grit, can be used to refine the surface.
The aim is a smooth transition between the repair and the original hull.
This is where touch can be more revealing than sight. A surface may look acceptable but still feel uneven under the fingers. Running a hand gently across the repair can reveal ridges, hollows and edges that the eye misses.
On a racing boat, fair surfaces matter. Champagne does not need unnecessary lumps, bumps or rough patches slowing her down — she will have enough trouble with me learning how to sail her properly.
The epoxy repair needs a proper finish.
If the hull is gelcoated, a matching marine gelcoat can be applied over the cured and sanded repair to restore protection and appearance. If the boat is painted, then the repair needs to be finished in a way that is compatible with the existing paint system.
The finish is not just about making the patch disappear. It protects the repair from water and ultraviolet light and helps restore the hull surface.
Once the gelcoat has cured, it can be wet-sanded through finer grades — for example 400 grit and then 600 grit — before polishing with rubbing compound and wax to bring back the gloss.
This is the point where the repair starts to look less like a workshop job and more like part of the boat again.
In theory, matching gelcoat is straightforward.
In practice, boats age.
White is not always white. Cream is not always cream. A hull that has spent decades in sunlight, water and weather may have faded, yellowed or changed tone. A brand-new repair can sometimes look cleaner than the surrounding area, which is both satisfying and annoying.
For Champagne, the aim is not concours perfection at this stage. The priority is a sound, watertight, strong repair. Appearance matters, but protection matters first.
That is probably going to be a repeated theme in this restoration:
Safety first.
Sailing performance second.
Beauty third.
Although, being Champagne, she will probably insist on beauty being at least joint second.
This job is small, but it reflects the larger restoration project.
A classic racing boat is not restored in one heroic burst. It is restored through a long sequence of sensible decisions:
The gouges are part of that bigger process.
They are a reminder that restoration is not just about dramatic before-and-after photographs. It is often about tiny jobs done properly before they become large jobs done expensively.
One of the things I am learning about boat ownership is that boats are very good teachers.
They teach patience, because rushing usually creates more work.
They teach humility, because even a small job can reveal how much you still have to learn.
They teach planning, because the right repair depends on weather, materials, tools, curing times and the availability of a flat bit of space that is not currently covered in ropes, sanding dust or someone else’s trolley.
They also teach restraint.
The exciting part of owning Champagne is imagining her sailing properly again, tall rig pulling, long hull moving through the Thames, the whole boat looking elegant and slightly ridiculous in the best possible A-Rater way.
But before that comes sanding, cleaning, filling, curing, sanding again and finishing.
The river can wait for a proper repair.
Champagne is not just another boat in the boat park. She is becoming a project, a story, a film series and hopefully a returning racing boat.
That means the small jobs deserve to be recorded too.
A video of a gouge being cleaned and filled may not have quite the drama of a race start, but it is part of the same story. Every repair helps bring her back. Every careful job reduces the chance of trouble later. Every photographed stage becomes part of her restoration record.
And for anyone following the project, it shows the real side of classic boat ownership.
Not just champagne moments.
Also sandpaper moments.
The gouges in Champagne’s hull are not the largest problem we will face. They are not the most glamorous job. They will not make the most spectacular photograph.
But they matter.
A GRP hull depends on its protective surface. Damage should be cleaned, bevelled, filled, sanded and properly finished before water and use make the problem worse.
So before Champagne does too much sailing, these small gouges will be repaired properly with marine-grade materials and a patient approach.
It is not the most exciting part of bringing an A-Rater back to racing condition.
But it is exactly the sort of job that makes the exciting parts possible.
Before Champagne can sparkle on the Thames, she needs a little careful mending underneath.
Before Champagne is fully restored, before she is back racing properly on the River Thames, and before most people have even worked out what a Thames A-Rater actually is, she already needs one important thing.
A sound.
That may seem a strange priority when there are more obvious jobs waiting: varnish to inspect, rigging to understand, sails to assess, fittings to check, covers to sort out, and a boat park full of practical problems. But video changes the order in which people experience a story.
In real life, people see the boat first.
In a film, they often hear the story first.
The first few seconds of music can tell the audience whether this is a serious restoration film, a comic adventure, a piece of sailing history, a racing documentary, or a slightly alarming story about a man who bought a classic racing boat and is now discovering what that actually means.
In the case of Champagne, it is probably all of those things at once.
Stock music is useful. It saves time, it is affordable, and sometimes it does the job perfectly well. The problem is that it often sounds as though it belongs to somebody else’s story.
A cheerful ukulele track can make a boat restoration feel like an advert for garden furniture. A dramatic cinematic track can make sanding varnish look as if we are preparing to invade a small country. A corporate inspirational track can turn a classic Thames racing boat into a sales conference.
Champagne needs something more specific.
She is not a modern speedboat. She is not a plastic training dinghy. She is not a yacht crossing an ocean. She is a Thames A-Rater: elegant, slightly eccentric, tall-rigged, historic, delicate-looking, and yet designed to race hard on a stretch of river where the wind can be as unpredictable as a cat in a workshop.
The music has to understand that.
It needs elegance, but not pomposity.
Drama, but not melodrama.
Humour, but not silliness.
History, but not a museum label.
Movement, but not a generic action-film drum loop.
That is why I would rather compose something myself.
Before touching a keyboard, organ, synthesiser or computer, the first question is not, “What chords shall I use?”
The first question is, “Who is Champagne?”
For the video series, Champagne is not just an object. She is almost a character. She has travelled back to the Thames. She carries the look and spirit of the A-Rater class. She needs work, care and money. She may be beautiful, awkward, expensive, fast, fragile, and occasionally infuriating.
That gives the music a starting point.
Her main theme should probably feel:
A good theme does not need to be complicated. In fact, for video, a simple theme is often more useful because it can be rearranged. A short musical phrase can appear on organ, strings, piano, synthesiser, or even as a quiet background motif under spoken narration.
The aim is not to write a symphony. The aim is to create a musical identity.
One advantage of having a studio full of instruments is that the soundtrack does not have to come from one sound source.
The Wersi digital organ is particularly interesting because it can produce a wide range of tones: classic organ sounds, orchestral textures, warm pads, brass-like flourishes, and more modern electronic colours. It can sound grand, nostalgic, playful or cinematic depending on how it is used.
For Champagne, I can imagine several musical layers.
A gentle organ or soft keyboard sound could suggest heritage and elegance. A flowing synth pad could suggest the river. A slightly brighter lead sound could carry the main theme. Low, subtle tones could add weight during restoration problems or racing tension.
The danger, of course, is getting carried away.
A Thames A-Rater does not need to sound like a science fiction battleship. Unless, of course, the varnish bill arrives.
The trick is restraint. The music should support the film, not elbow the boat out of the way and announce, “Look at me, I have twelve synthesiser tracks and a dramatic cymbal swell.”
The River Thames has its own rhythm. It is not the open sea. It is narrower, more intimate, more enclosed. The wind shifts around trees. The water moves steadily. Boats tack frequently. The banks, moorings, birds, safety boats and club launches all become part of the atmosphere.
A river-based theme should probably move in a way that feels like water rather than machinery.
That might mean:
A repeating piano or keyboard pattern that gently ripples underneath the melody.
A slow, rising phrase that suggests the mast and sail lifting into view.
A waltz-like or lilting rhythm to suggest the boat moving over water.
A quieter version for dawn, restoration and reflection.
A faster version for racing, mark rounding and close manoeuvres.
The same theme could be used in several forms. A full version might open the main Champagne video. A stripped-down version might play under old photographs or historical explanations. A more urgent version might appear when Champagne is finally back on the start line with other A-Raters.
This is where composing original music becomes powerful. One theme can follow the whole story.
Restoration footage needs a very different musical treatment from racing footage.
When filming varnishing, sanding, inspecting fittings, sorting sails or discovering another small job that has quietly become a large job, the music should not be too grand. If the soundtrack becomes too heroic while I am holding a sanding block, the result may be unintentionally comic.
Restoration music needs patience.
It can use steady rhythms, warm textures and small repeating motifs. It should suggest care, attention and progress. It can also allow room for humour, because classic boat restoration is rarely a straight march to glory. More often, it is a series of discoveries beginning with the phrase, “That probably just needs a quick look.”
A restoration cue might begin simply: a soft keyboard pulse, a gentle organ chord, perhaps a few notes of the Champagne theme appearing slowly.
Then, when a problem is found — water under varnish, a wobbly rudder cassette, a tired fitting, or a cover with more holes than cover — the music can shift slightly. Not into horror-film territory, but enough to say, “Ah. This may take longer than expected.”
Racing needs energy, but not generic speed.
A-Rater racing is visually dramatic because of the height of the rig, the narrow hulls, the crew movement, and the way the boats seem to carry far more sail than any sensible person would attach to something so slender.
The music for racing should build tension without becoming ridiculous. A faster pulse, stronger bass movement, rhythmic percussion, or repeated synth pattern could all work well. The main Champagne theme could be transformed into something more urgent.
For example:
The restoration version of the theme might be slow and reflective.
The racing version could use the same notes but with a stronger rhythm and brighter instrumentation.
That gives continuity. The viewer hears the same musical identity but feels a different emotional state.
This is important because the series will not just be about a boat sitting in a boat park. Eventually, it should be about Champagne returning to the river, joining the fleet, and racing again.
The soundtrack needs to be ready for that moment.
The historical sections need another tone again.
When explaining what a Thames A-Rater is, why the class matters, how the boats developed, and why they still fascinate people, the music should give a sense of heritage without turning into a costume drama.
This is where organ sounds can be useful. Not necessarily full church organ thunder — though that is always tempting — but gentle, sustained organ colours can suggest age, tradition and continuity.
A few more classical harmonies may help. A slower tempo may give space for old photographs, archive material, drawings, class history, and explanations of the River Thames sailing culture.
The aim is to make the history feel alive.
Not “Here is a dusty old thing from the past.”
More “Here is a living tradition that still gets wet, still breaks things, still races hard, and still attracts people who should perhaps know better.”
One of the most interesting parts of a boat film is that the boat already makes music.
Water against the hull.
Halyards tapping the mast.
Rigging humming in the wind.
Birds along the river.
Footsteps on the pontoon.
Sails filling.
Blocks clicking.
A distant safety boat.
The soft slap of water under the bow.
These sounds are not background noise. Used carefully, they can become part of the soundtrack.
A film does not always need music playing constantly. Sometimes the best opening is natural sound: water, wind, and the quiet metallic sound of rigging. Then the music enters slowly, almost as if it has grown out of the river.
For Champagne, I would like to record these sounds properly rather than relying only on camera microphones. Short audio recordings around the boat park, on the water, beside the moorings and during rigging could provide a library of real Champagne sounds.
These can then be layered into the soundtrack.
A halyard tap could become a rhythmic element.
Water sounds could sit under a quiet keyboard texture.
Birdsong could introduce a calm morning sequence.
Wind in the rigging could lead into a dramatic racing section.
This makes the music belong to the place.
The same footage can mean completely different things depending on the music.
A shot of Champagne sitting under a temporary cover could feel hopeful, sad, comic or dramatic.
With gentle music, it becomes a quiet beginning.
With ominous music, it becomes a warning.
With jaunty music, it becomes a comic restoration disaster.
With no music at all, it becomes factual and observational.
That is why soundtrack decisions matter.
Music tells the viewer how to feel before they have had time to decide for themselves. Used badly, it manipulates. Used well, it guides.
For the Champagne series, I want the music to support the truth of the project. There will be excitement, but also uncertainty. There will be beauty, but also practical work. There will be history, but also invoices. There will be racing dreams, but also sandpaper.
The soundtrack needs to make room for all of that.
Rather than composing a completely new piece for every video, it makes sense to build a musical toolkit.
This could include:
A main Champagne theme.
A gentle restoration version.
A faster racing version.
A short historical cue.
A comic “something has gone wrong” cue.
A calm river atmosphere bed.
A closing version for reflective endings.
This approach would make the series feel coherent. Viewers may not consciously notice that the same theme is returning, but they will begin to associate the sound with the boat.
That is how branding works in film. It is not just logos, colours and titles. It is also sound.
Champagne needs visual branding, but she also needs musical branding.
The practical process will probably look something like this.
First, I will sketch simple melodic ideas on the Wersi or keyboard, looking for a phrase that feels like Champagne rather than a generic sailing video.
Then I will record several versions: slow, medium and more energetic.
Next, I will experiment with instrumentation. Organ, piano, strings, synth pads and subtle percussion can each change the feel completely.
After that, I will place the music against rough video edits. This is the real test. A piece of music may sound lovely on its own but completely wrong when placed under footage of a mast being raised, a varnish brush being opened, or a boat trying to behave itself at a mark.
Then comes trimming, looping and adjusting. Film music has to serve the edit. Sometimes the best musical decision is to remove a section entirely and let the natural sound take over.
Finally, the music has to be mixed so that speech remains clear. A beautiful soundtrack is no use if it fights the narration. The viewer must be able to hear the story.
One of the enjoyable things about the Champagne project is that it brings together so many parts of what Philip M Russell Ltd already does.
There is video production.
There is photography.
There is storytelling.
There is workshop problem-solving.
There is sailing.
There is education.
There is history.
And now there is music.
The same studio used for teaching science online can also become a music production space. The same attention to detail needed for filming experiments applies to recording sound. The same storytelling skills used in educational videos can help explain why a classic racing boat matters.
That is what makes the project exciting.
Champagne is not just a boat restoration. She is a film project, a teaching project, a media project, a historical project, and quite possibly a financial warning.
But she deserves a soundtrack.
A boat like Champagne has already lived a story before I became involved. She has history, shape, character and presence. The task now is to help tell the next chapter properly.
Music will be a major part of that.
The right soundtrack can make restoration feel patient and purposeful. It can make racing feel exciting. It can make history feel alive. It can make quiet river scenes feel beautiful. It can even make the occasional disaster feel survivable.
Before Champagne is fully back on the water, before the sails are sorted, before the varnish is perfect, and before the start line drama begins, her story can start to take shape in sound.
Because sometimes, before people see the boat properly, they hear her first.
“Before Champagne even reaches the start line, she needs an audience.”
Buying a Thames A-Rater is one thing. Learning how to sail, restore, present and promote one is something else entirely.
Champagne is not just a boat. She is a project, a story, a challenge, a piece of Thames sailing heritage and, if I am honest, a rather large invitation to discover just how much I still have to learn. Long before she is fully restored, beautifully varnished and charging elegantly up the river, there is another job to do: building her social media presence.
In today’s world, even a historic racing boat benefits from being visible. If people are going to follow Champagne’s restoration, cheer on her progress and feel part of the adventure, they need somewhere to find her. That means creating a social media identity that is interesting, welcoming and consistent.
This is not just about promotion. It is about storytelling.
A boat like Champagne deserves more than a quiet existence under a cover in the boat park.
She has history, character and potential. She also has a future story waiting to unfold: restoration work, sailing trials, race preparation, inevitable setbacks, little victories and, hopefully, some glorious days back on the Thames. Social media gives that story a place to live in public.
There are several reasons for building an online presence for Champagne:
There is something powerful about inviting people along at the beginning. If they see the first inspections, the rough edges, the varnish problems, the sail debates and the learning process, they become invested. By the time Champagne reaches the water in earnest, people are not just watching a boat — they are following a story they feel part of.
One of the first questions is simple: where should Champagne appear?
The obvious answer is “everywhere”, but that can quickly turn into chaos if there is no plan. Each platform has a slightly different role.
Facebook is useful for building a community and keeping a running public record of updates. It works well for:
Facebook is often where people are willing to comment, share their memories and tag others who may be interested. For a project like Champagne, that matters.
Instagram is the visual shop window. It is ideal for:
If Facebook is the club noticeboard, Instagram is the glossy display window.
YouTube is where the deeper storytelling happens. This is the perfect home for:
Video brings the project to life in a way still images cannot. A boat has movement, sound and personality, and YouTube is where that really shows.
The blog gives room for detail. This is where the longer thoughts belong:
A blog allows depth and personality. It also helps with search visibility and gives everything a permanent home.
Patreon is perhaps for later rather than immediately, but it is worth considering. If the project develops a strong following, Patreon could support:
That said, it only works if people feel a strong connection first. Social media has to build the relationship before Patreon can ask for support.
The first post matters because it sets the tone.
It does not need to be perfect. In fact, over-polished first posts can feel slightly lifeless. What it does need to do is invite people in.
A good first post for Champagne should do three things:
For example, a strong first post might say that Champagne is a Thames A-Rater with a new future ahead of her, that the project will include restoration, sailing, videos and plenty of learning along the way, and that followers are invited to come along for the ride.
It should not read like a press release. It should sound human.
People do not follow accounts because the punctuation is perfect. They follow because there is a story, a personality and a sense that something interesting is about to happen.
One challenge is that outside the sailing world, very few people know what a Thames A-Rater is.
Even within sailing, they are not exactly mainstream. So one of the most important parts of Champagne’s social media identity is education.
If the account assumes everyone already understands the class, it risks becoming too narrow. Better to explain clearly and simply.
A useful approach is to create a short introductory post or video:
That explanation should avoid disappearing into jargon too quickly. There is plenty of time later for discussions about rig tuning, sail shape and restoration detail. First, people need to understand why the boat is special.
Short explainer videos could be especially useful here. A 30–60 second video with photographs, river shots and a simple voiceover could do far more than a block of text.
This is perhaps the most important social media lesson of all.
People do not need to wait until the exciting part starts. The preparation is part of the exciting part.
It is tempting to think: “We should wait until Champagne looks better.” But in social media terms, the early, messy, uncertain phase is often the most engaging. That is when the story feels real.
Possible content before regular racing even begins includes:
These posts invite people into the process. They help followers feel that they are watching a proper journey rather than just being shown the end result.
Emotion matters here. If followers see not just the boat but the hopes, concerns, mistakes and progress around it, they become far more likely to care.
A healthy social media presence usually needs a mixture of content rather than one repeated format.
For Champagne, there are three especially strong content types.
These are excellent for grabbing attention. Ideas include:
Short videos perform well because they are easy to consume and easy to share.
These create continuity. Even small updates matter:
Not every post has to be dramatic. Regularity often matters more than drama.
These give Champagne depth and context. For example:
Historical content helps the project appeal beyond the immediate restoration. It also gives followers a reason to value the boat as heritage, not just as a possession.
Social media works best when people feel something.
For Champagne, the emotion is not just excitement about racing. It is the sense of restoring and reviving something beautiful and important.
People can become emotionally invested in several ways:
A boat account that only posts polished photographs may look nice, but it often lacks emotional pull. A boat account that shares uncertainty, hope, small improvements and real enthusiasm is much more compelling.
For example, a post saying:
“Today’s progress: not glamorous. We inspected the cover, found more holes than confidence, and added ‘proper cover’ to the growing list.”
That has character. It is informative, but it also sounds human. People remember that.
This balance is important.
Thames A-Raters deserve respect. They are part of a long and rather wonderful sailing tradition. But that does not mean the content should be solemn and overly formal.
A little humour helps enormously, particularly when it reflects the real experience of restoration and sailing.
There is plenty of room for posts that gently poke fun at the process:
Humour makes heritage accessible. It also makes the people behind the project feel real.
The key is not to make the class feel trivial. Rather, it is to show affection, enthusiasm and honesty. Serious sailing heritage and a smile are not opposites. In fact, they often work beautifully together.
Social media presence is not only about words. It also needs a recognisable look.
Champagne should ideally have a simple but coherent visual identity across all platforms. That might include:
This does not have to become corporate. In fact, it should not. But consistency helps people recognise the project instantly.
Possible visual themes might include:
A good identity makes even ordinary updates feel part of a larger story.
Any social media project teaches lessons quickly. I suspect Champagne’s will be no different.
Some practical lessons already seem obvious:
If you wait until everything is perfect, nothing gets posted.
Not everyone knows sailing terminology. Clear explanations win.
Photos, reels, blog links, explanations and humour all have a place.
People enjoy seeing how things develop.
Followers respond to personality more than polish.
This is not a one-week campaign. It is the beginning of an ongoing story.
What interests me about building Champagne’s social media presence is that it combines several things I enjoy: sailing, storytelling, photography, video, design and teaching.
In some ways, explaining Champagne online is rather like teaching. You start with the assumption that many people know very little about the subject. You then try to make it clear, interesting and enjoyable without losing the depth of the topic.
That challenge appeals to me.
I also like the idea that a social media presence can help keep old traditions alive. A Thames A-Rater is not just a boat of the past. Through video, photos and regular posts, she can become part of a living story that reaches far beyond the club gates.
And if the account also includes the occasional restoration blunder, varnish frustration or mildly panicked question about sails, so much the better. That is part of the reality, and reality is usually more interesting than polish.
Before Champagne can race properly, she needs something else in place: attention, interest and a community.
That community will not appear by accident. It has to be built through thoughtful posting, clear storytelling and a genuine sense of invitation. The aim is not simply to collect followers. It is to create a group of people who care what happens next.
That means introducing the Thames A-Rater to non-sailors, sharing restoration progress, posting short videos, using history well and keeping the tone warm and human. It also means remembering that the story begins long before the first competitive start.
Champagne does not need to be fully finished before she becomes worth following.
In fact, the opposite is true.
The earlier people join the story, the more they will care about where it leads.
Can you spot what's wrong? First problem discovered on Champagne No.21! The rudder cassette wobbles before the rudder even starts to m...